Rethinking capital markets reform: a reassessment of Olson problem and regulatory dualism in the German capital markets from a varieties of capitalism perspective

Author:

Ziccardi de Carvalho André

Abstract

Since its proposition by Peter A. Hall and David Soskice the Varieties of Capitalism (VoC) approach has been particularly important to explain the relationship between economic agents and sets of institutional arrangements that, even in regulatory scenarios that Law and Finance’s school would consider “less than optimal”, are able to generate sustainable economic growth. In this context the VoC approach has been consistently challenging the traditional “one fits all” approach towards capital markets reform usually endorsed by institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, as well as by many scholars and capital markets regulators associated with La Porta’s Law and Finance School. As any theoretical framework, however, the VoC approach also faces its own challenges and still lacks the scientific maturity achieved by the Law and Finance School. Consequently a conciliation between the relational view of the firm proposed by the VoC approach and the overview of corporate governance practices throughout the world presented by the Law and Finance School would be instrumental to construe a more clear understanding of the competitive advantages generated by certain sets of institutions and, at the same time, more accurately assess impacts of reforms that, even if implemented with the legitimate goal of promoting firms’ transparency and higher corporate governance standards, may counter-intuitively generate unprecedented corporate and capital markets crisis. By analyzing two concepts proposed by Ronald J. Gilson, Henry Hansmann and Mariana Pargendler that have an apparent fundamental link to La Porta’s school of Law and Finance (i.e. Olson Problem and Regulatory Dualism) through a varieties of capitalism approach, this study aims at rethinking the traditional “one fits all” approach towards capital markets reform and taking a further step in the direction of conciliating the VoC approach with La Porta’s Law and Finance School. The analysis proposed in this article considers corporate and capital markets reforms in Germany between 1950 and 1997 (the year of creation of the Neuer Market) and also takes into consideration underlying economic factors of the German market economy, which ultimately contributed to the collapse of the Neuer Markt on late 2001.

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management

Reference61 articles.

1. Adams, Michael. 1999. ‚Cross Holdings in Germany’ In Journal of Theoretical Economics (JITE), Volume 155, Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG,

2. ____________. 1993. Macht von Banken und Versicherungen – Wettbewerb im Finanzdienstleistungssektor. 8. Dezember 1993 Deutscher Bundestag. Ausschuss für Wirtschaft. Stellungnahme. Avaiable at: http://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/fileadmin/bwl/rechtderwirtschaft/institut/Veroeffentlichungen/banken.PDF

3. Bartone, Roberto. 2002. Die kleine Aktiengesellschaft. Bielefeld: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

4. BARZ, CARL HANS et al. 1962. Das Frankfurter Publizitätsgespräch: Vorträge und Diskussionen der gleichnamigen Tagung in Königstein/Ts am 13. Und 14. April 1962. Frankfurt am Main: Fritz Knapp Verlag.

5. Baums, Theodor / Fraune, Christian. 1994. Institutionelle Anleger und Publikumsgesellschaft: Eine empirische Untersuchung. Arbeitspapier 6/94. Avaiable at: http://www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/43029219/paper20.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3