Abstract
In his article ‘death of distance’, Caincross (1997) challenged the orthodoxy with regard to the role and direction of proximity in international trade. The mainstream model for trade analysis, the gravity model has only two prominent determinants – one of which is distance. But while this theory predicts a negative impact of distance on trade, empirical evidence seems to be evenly split between those finding a positive and those finding a negative impact of distance on trade. South Africa’s total exports to three groups of countries at different distances are measured to determine the impact of distance. The results indicate that distance shows a negative sign when African countries are concerned but turns positive when European countries, even more distant, enter the equation.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference58 articles.
1. Agu, C. and Jordaan, A.C. (2009), “Regional Integration and Intra-Group Trade: Re-Examining the Role of Trade Facilitation in SADC”, Paper presented at the Economic Society of South Africa Conference 2009, Port Elizabeth.
2. Anderson, J.E. and E. van Wincoop, (2003), “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border
3. Puzzle”, American Economic Review, Vol. 93 No. 1, pp. 170–192.
4. Berthelon, M. and Freund, C. (2004), “On the Conservation of Distance in International Trade”, Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 3293, World Bank.
5. Brun, J.F., Carrere, C., Guillaumont, P. and de Melo, J. (2002), “Has Distance Died? Evidence from a Panel Gravity Model”, World Bank Economic Review.