Affiliation:
1. Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Abstract
Public administration has become the main force for society as well as the government. Given the relevance and urgency of public administration research, this research aims to present publications on public administration research from the Scopus database using bibliometric analysis. The method of this research is qualitative methods using Publish or Perish by Harzing for citations in the form of metrics, Microsoft Excel for frequency analysis, and VOS viewer for data visualization with period time 2010–2021. Based on the research results, the publications on public administration research have been consistently increasing since 2015 with 656 citations. The most popular keywords identified in the document set are development, drug administration, food and practice, China, impact, public administration review and state, application, public administration research, big data, future, case, evolution, and efficiency. The relevance of public administration research probably lies in striking the right balance between application and theory development. On the one hand, public administration research should expose researchers to real-life managerial challenges and give them the necessary tools to implement policy successfully. On the other hand, it should also expose public administration researchers to critical thinking and empower them to engage in governance and societal challenges, propose theoretical solutions and build new theories.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference67 articles.
1. Aghaei Chadegani, A., Mohamed, Z. M., & Jari, A. (2011). The determinant factors of auditor switch among companies listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 80, 158–168. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2227597
2. Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on web accessibility. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6S2), 250–258. https://aidi-ahmi.com/download/2019%20-%20IJRTE_Ahmi%20&%20Rosli.pdf
3. Akhavan, P., Ebrahim, N. A., Fetrati, M. A., & Pezeshkan, A. (2016). Major trends in knowledge management research: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1249–1264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1938-x
4. Arias, M. I., & Gastaud Maçada, A. C. (2016). Dimensiones preliminares para un modelo de valor de la tecnología de la información en el sector público. Proceedings of the XI Jornadas de Docentes Universitarios de Sistemas y Tecnologías de la Información. Universidad Nacional del Sur. http://repositoriodigital.uns.edu.ar/handle/123456789/4357
5. Aucoin, P. (2012). New political governance in Westminster systems: Impartial public administration and management performance at risk. Governance, 25(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01569.x
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Fiscal stimulus: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis;Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions;2024