Abstract
The future of international politics today hinges on how the Sino-American rivalry unfolds. Views
vary from expectations of peaceful evolution to hegemonic transition, but many fail to recognize
the significant role the liberal international order (LIO) can play in shaping the course of events.
Thanks to its structure and adaptability, the LIO is more than the mere environment surrounding
this rivalry and may be the primary determinant of American and Chinese choices, steering relations
toward cooperation. The success of the LIO during the post-WWII era is notably the product of the
environment it has managed to create, characterized by mutual gains, as well as considerable costs in
the event of a revisionist disruption. Moreover, the LIO has a structural character that enables it to exert
influence on state behavior. This article, drawing on liberal internationalist theory, contends that the
LIO demonstrates the substantial potential to emerge as the ultimate “victor” amidst the intensifying
rivalry between the two major actors. By evaluating multiple arguments, the analysis concludes that a
reformed version of the LIO, which accommodates both American and Chinese aspirations, includes a
dual leadership mechanism in decision-making, and reflects the newly shaped power dynamics, offers
a viable solution to the Sino-American competition.
Reference96 articles.
1. Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421-456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002.081.800551280.
2. Acharya, A. (2018). The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity.
3. Albright, M. (2019). Fascism: A Warning. London: William Collins.
4. Alcaro, R. (2018). Contestation and Transformation. Final Thoughts on the Liberal International Order. The
International Spectator, 53(1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932.729.2018.1429533
5. Allison, G. (2017a). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? New York:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.