Author:
Deemer Alexa R.,Ganta Abhishek,Leucht Philipp,Konda Sanjit,Egol Kenneth A.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of peripheral nerve blocks in the operative management of tibial plateau fractures is associated with improved outcomes when compared with the use of spinal and general anesthesia. Over a period of 16 years, 132 patients who underwent operative repair for a low-energy tibial plateau fracture and had at least 12 months of follow-up met the inclusion criteria and formed the basis of this study. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on the anesthetic method used during surgery: peripheral nerve block in combination with conscious sedation or general anesthesia (BA), general anesthesia alone (GA), or spinal anesthesia alone (SA). Outcomes were assessed at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Length of stay was greatest in the GA cohort (
P
<.05), and more patients in the BA cohort were discharged to home (
P
<.05). Patients in the GA cohort had the highest pain scores at 3 months and 6 months (
P
<.05). Patients in both the SA and BA cohorts had better Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores at 6 and 12 months when compared with the GA cohort (
P
<.05). Although knee range of motion did not differ among the three cohorts at 3 months, it did differ at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, with those who had a preoperative nerve blockade (SA and BA) having the greatest knee range of motion (
P
<.05). Regional anesthesia was safe and was associated with lower pain scores in the early postoperative period and greater knee range of motion and functional outcome scores in the late postoperative period. [
Orthopedics
. 2023;46(6):358–364.]
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献