Author:
Hall Tyler B.,Hyman Max J.,Patel Neeraj M.
Abstract
Osteochondral autograft (OAU) transfer and osteochondral allograft (OAL) transfer are options for treating sizable articular cartilage lesions in the knee, but there is little evidence to support one technique over another. The goal of this study is to compare the rate of reoperation among children and adolescents undergoing OAU or OAL of the knee. In this retrospective cohort study, the Pediatric Health Information System, a national database consisting of 49 children's hospitals, was queried for all patients undergoing OAU and OAL between 2012 and 2018. A total of 732 subjects with a mean age of 15.4±2.4 years were included. Of these, 393 (53.7%) initially underwent OAL and 339 (46.3%) underwent OAU. The overall reoperation rate was 144 of 732 (19.7%) at a median of 6.6 months (range, 0.6–53.5 months) after the index operation. This rate was similar for OAL and OAU. For 18 subjects (2.5%), OAU, OAL, or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) was performed at the time of revision surgery. When analyzing only open procedures, we found that the reoperation rate was 25.5% for open OAU compared with 16.5% for open OAL (
P
=.03). When adjusting for covariates in multivariate regression, we found that those who underwent open OAU had 1.7 times higher odds of requiring a future reoperation than those who underwent open OAL (95% CI, 1.1–2.8;
P
=.04). Although the rate of reoperation after OAU or OAL among children and adolescents is relatively high, few require revision OAU, OAL, or ACI. Patients undergoing open OAU have higher odds of ultimately requiring reoperation than those undergoing open OAL. [
Orthopedics
. 2022;45(6):378–383.]
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery