Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Loop and Double-Loop Debriefing Techniques

Author:

Yu Chun-Ti,Hsiao Fei-Hsiu

Abstract

Background: The goal of this study is to compare the quality between single-loop and double-loop debriefing techniques from the perspectives of new nurses, preceptors, and senior nurses. Single-loop debriefing techniques were used in traditional nursing education. In recent years, double-loop debriefing techniques have been used in nursing education. Method: This study adopted a prospective observational design, and the sample included three groups, new nurses, preceptors, and senior nurses, each with 53 participants. The Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) instrument was used to measure the quality of different debriefing techniques. Results: The DASH scores for double-loop debriefing techniques were significantly higher than the scores for single-loop debriefing techniques among the three groups. The scores for new nurses were higher than those for the senior nurses and preceptors. Conclusion: The results indicated that double-loop debriefing techniques are more effective than single-loop debriefing techniques. Double-loop debriefing techniques can improve teaching satisfaction. [ J Contin Educ Nurs. 202x;5x(x):xx–xx.]

Publisher

SLACK, Inc.

Subject

Review and Exam Preparation,General Nursing,Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3