Prematurity May Affect the Postoperative Sensory Results in Children With Strabismus

Author:

Niyaz Leyla,Kocak Nurullah,Subası Mustafa,Yucel Ozlem Eski

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the motor and sensory outcomes of strabismus surgery in children born preterm (premature group) and full-term (control group). Methods: The study was performed at a tertiary university hospital. Children who underwent strabismus surgery between 2012 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The success of surgery, postoperative over-correction and undercorrection rates, and stereopsis and fusion test results were compared between the premature and control groups. Results: There were 70 patients in the premature group (mean gestational age: 31.25 weeks; range: 24 to 35 weeks) and 242 patients in the control group. The amounts of preoperative and postoperative deviations and overcorrection, undercorrection, and success rates were similar between the premature and control groups ( P > .05). Stereopsis improved from 560 to 300 arc/sec postoperatively in the premature group ( P = .066) and from 1,156 to 685 arc/sec in the control group ( P < .001). The rate of fusion increased from 12.5% to 25% in the premature group ( P = .50) and from 17% to 47% in the control group ( P < .001). The analysis of strabismus subgroups revealed significant improvement of fusion in full-term patients ( P < .001) and not in preterm patients ( P = .50) with esotropia. Preoperative amount of deviation was the only risk factor for surgical success ( P < .001). Age, sex, history of prematurity, and spherical equivalent refraction were not correlated with undercorrection ( P > .05). Conclusions: Regardless of the type of strabismus, although the functional results after strabismus surgery were similar in preterm and full-term patients, the gain of stereopsis and central fusion was significantly higher in full-term patients compared to preterm patients. [ J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus . 2024;61(4):267–272.]

Publisher

SLACK, Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3