Understanding the Use of the Newcastle, PEDIG, and LACTOSE Control Scores Among Pediatric Ophthalmologists for Intermittent Exotropia

Author:

Thuma Tobin B. T.,Zhang Qiang (Ed),Sharpe James,Gunton Kammi B.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the clinical use patterns of control scores for intermittent exotropia. The Newcastle Control Score, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) score, and Look And Cover, then Ten seconds of Observation Scale for Exotropia (LACTOSE) Control Score were developed to quantify control of exodeviations. Methods: A short survey was posted on the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus forum in August and September 2021. Respondents were asked about their assessment of control in intermittent exotropia, including knowledge and use of the various control scales. Results: One hundred fourteen pediatric ophthalmologists responded; 54.4% (n = 62) reported not using any specific control score for intermittent exotropia, although 61.4% (n = 70) were familiar with the PEDIG score, 37.7% (n = 43) with the Newcastle Control Score, and 7.9% (n = 9) with the LACTOSE Control Score. The PEDIG score was the most widely used (26.3%, n = 30), but 36.7% (n = 11) of respondents reported that the scale is too time-intensive, limiting its use. To improve the use of the control scores, participants recommended promoting wider understanding of the scales (45.6%, n = 52). Conclusions: Most responding pediatric ophthalmologists do not use a specific control score in managing intermittent exotropia. The PEDIG score is the most frequently used but is reported as time-intensive. Although the LACTOSE Control Score was designed to provide a quicker alternative, it is not widely known. Promoting wider awareness and understanding of intermittent exotropia control scores may be helpful to allow for more objective quantification of control in intermittent exotropia. [ J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus . 2023;60(2):131–138.]

Publisher

SLACK, Inc.

Subject

Ophthalmology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3