Author:
Long Yan,Li XiuYi,Zhou Tianan,Ye Bei,Guo DongYu,Shen Ye
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To compare the visual quality, accommodation, and stereoacuity between patients with a myopia magnitude of −3.00 to −8.50 diopters (D) who underwent ICLV4c (STAAR Surgical) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
METHODS:
The visual quality parameters, amplitude of accommodation (AMP), and stereoacuity were compared between and within the ICLV4c and SMILE groups (40 eyes/group) with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of −6.14 D. Differences in these parameters before and after surgery were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 software (SPSS, Inc).
RESULTS:
Modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off increased significantly by 3.24 cycles/degree (
t
= −2.111,
P
= .041) and AMP decreased significantly by 1.66 D (
t
= 7.519,
P
< .001) from baseline to 3 months after surgery in the ICLV4c group. However, the MTF cut-off was significantly lower (
t
= 2.123,
P
= .037) and the AMP was significantly better (
t
= −3.605,
P
= .001) in the SMILE group than in the ICLV4c group at 3 months postoperatively. Other parameters such as Objective Scatter Index, Strehl ratio, and Optical Quality Analysis System (Visiometrics) under different contrast values did not show significant changes (
P
> .05). Stereoacuity did not improve significantly, except in a patient with anisometropia (2.50 D) in the ICLV4c group.
CONCLUSIONS:
The ICLV4c implantation yielded a better visual quality but worse AMP than did SMILE in patients with a myopia magnitude of −3.00 to −8.50 D in the short term.
[
J Refract Surg
. 2022;38(10):632-640.]