Author:
Vinciguerra Riccardo,Palladino Sara,Herber Robert,Romano Mario R.,Vinciguerra Paolo
Abstract
Purpose:
To assess the corneal biomechanical properties in normal individuals and patients with keratoconus using the Brillouin optical scanning system (Intelon Optics) (BOSS) and compare them with ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging (Corvis ST; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH).
Methods:
Sixty eyes from 60 patients (30 normal and 30 keratoconus) were included in this prospective, single-center, comparative, non-interventional study. Corneal biomechanics were evaluated using the Corvis ST and the BOSS. With the BOSS, each corneal image was acquired three times, measuring 10 locations within an 8-mm diameter. Parameters extracted included mean, maximum, and minimum Brillouin shift. These 10 points were also grouped into superior, central, and inferior regions. BOSS repeatability was assessed using the coefficient of repeatability and coefficient of variation. Furthermore, normal individuals and patients with keratoconus were compared using the Corvis ST and BOSS.
Results:
The BOSS exhibited good repeatability, with coefficient of repeatability ranging from 0.098 to 0.138 GHz for single points in normal individuals and 0.096 to 0.149 GHz for patients with keratoconus. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between normal individuals and patients with keratoconus, indicating softer corneas in keratoconus, observed with both the Corvis ST and BOSS. Specifically, the BOSS showed significant differences in mean, inferior, and superior mean, maximum, and minimum Brillouin frequency shift (all
P
< .05), whereas the Corvis ST displayed highly significant differences in stiffness parameter at first applanation, stress strain index, deformation amplitude ratio, and inverse integrated radius (all
P
< .001).
Conclusions:
Corneal biomechanical measurements proved highly repeatable and effectively demonstrated significant differences between normal individuals and patients with keratoconus using both the BOSS and the Corvis ST.
[
J Refract Surg
. 2024;40(8):e569–e578.]