Validity Evidence of a Model and Measure of Life Balance

Abstract

This study examined the construct validity of a model and measure of life balance conceptualized as congruence among both desired and actual time spent in activities, and equivalence in the degree of discrepancy between desired and actual time spent across activities that meet health, relationship, challenge/interest, and identity needs. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships between life balance, perceived stress, personal well-being, and need satisfaction. A total of 458 participants representing mixed demographic groups participated in the study by completing four instruments. Structural equation modeling results indicated that congruence moderated by equivalence predicted lower stress, higher personal well-being, and higher need satisfaction, but equivalence alone did not. Working, having children at home, and being non-white negatively moderated congruence and larger family size positively moderated congruence. This study provides initial construct validity evidence for the model and measure of life balance.