Author:
Kavanagh Adam,Prentice Garry,Donohue Gráinne,Doyle Caroline,Farrington Aoife,Jennings Bernie,King Marie
Abstract
Background:
Instruments that measure clinical learning environments have lacked rigorous methodological approaches in their development and validity.
Method:
Development research using a survey design approach was conducted for an instrument to evaluate the quality of nursing students' clinical practice placement.
Results:
The development and validity of the Student Nurse Subjective Evaluation of Completed Clinical Practice Placement (SNEP) resulted in a 40-item instrument to evaluate nursing students' experience of their completed clinical practice placement. Adequate level of model fit was indicated (χ
2
[719] = 1909.47,
p
< .001) for the confirmatory factor analysis (χ
2
/
df
= 2.66, comparative fit index = 0.92, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.92, and root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.07). Standardized factor loadings were high, ranging from 0.68 to 0.95.
Conclusion:
The SNEP was designed and validated incorporating the perspective of various nurse stakeholders and can be used in both research and clinical learning environments.
[
J Nurs Educ
. 2022;61(10):559–569.]
Subject
Education,General Nursing
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献