Differentiation and Integration of Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Quality Improvement

Author:

Dunlap Jayne Jennings,Waldrop Julee Briscoe,Brewer Tracy L.,Mainous Rosalie O.

Abstract

Background: Substantial discrepancies exist in how research, evidence-based practice (EBP), and quality improvement (QI) are taught to nursing students across academic levels. As nursing education programs adopt the new The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education and move toward competency-based education, prelicensure and advanced nursing students will need to demonstrate research, EBP, and QI competencies; therefore, faculty must possess the knowledge and skills to teach these paradigms' differences and integration. Method: An evidence-based approach that builds on the literature and our experience as nurses and educators was used to develop this educational innovation. Results: An innovative representation in table and figure format of the differences and interdependence of research, EBP, and QI is presented herein. Conclusion: These documents clarify the evolving differences, similarities, and synergies as a framework for faculty development. [ J Nurs Educ . 2024;63(X):XXX–XXX.]

Publisher

SLACK, Inc.

Reference22 articles.

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021). The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Publications/Essentials-2021.pdf

2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2022). The state of doctor of nursing practice education in 2022. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/News/Surveys-Data/State-of-the-DNP-Summary-Report-June-2022.pdf

3. Identifying the Differences Between Quality Improvement, Evidence-based Practice, and Original Research

4. Statistical, practical and clinical significance and Doctor of Nursing Practice projects

5. Facilitating faculty knowledge of DNP quality improvement projects: Key elements to promote strong practice partnerships

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3