A Smartphone-Based Near-Vision Testing System: Design, Accuracy, and Reproducibility Compared With Standard Clinical Measures

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ophthalmologic telemedicine has emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy and reproducibility of a smartphone-based home vision monitoring system (Sightbook) and to compare it with existing clinical standards. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Near Snellen visual acuity (VA) was measured with Sightbook and compared with conventional measurements for distance and near VA at an academic medical center ophthalmology clinic in 200 patients with a variety of different specified preexisting ocular conditions. Measurements of contrast sensitivity were also compared by using an existing commercially available chart system in 15 normal patients and 15 patients with age-related macular degeneration. RESULTS: Sightbook VA tests were reproducible (SD = ±0.054 logMAR), and correlation with standard VA methods was significant ( R > 0.87 and P < .001). Sightbook contrast sensitivity measurements were reproducible (SD/mean ratio, 0.02 to 0.04), yielding results similar to those of standard tests (R2 > 0.87 and P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone-based VA and contrast sensitivity are highly correlated with standard charts and may be useful in augmenting limited inoffice care. [ Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina . 2022;53:79–84.]