Author:
Sridharan Sanjeev,Nakaima April,Gibson Rachael,White Claudeth,Kalugampitiya Asela,De Mel Randika,Liyanagamage Madhuka,MacDougall Ian
Abstract
Background: There is a need to rethink evaluator competencies given the harsh and paralyzing realities of COVID. The pandemic was a time where there was a need to balance diverse perspectives given the limited scientific evidence that existed when faced with a genuinely unprecedented time. In the Fall of 2021 (September to October), the Evaluation Centre for Complex Health Interventions in partnership with the Asia Pacific Evaluation Association organized a three-part webinar series in response to the multiple issues that surfaced during COVID-19, and specifically, the implications of the pandemic for rethinking evaluator competencies and evaluator training. The presenters were from multiple countries including India, Canada, USA, UK, and South Africa.
Purpose: The presenters pushed for more responsive evaluation approaches to address inequities and sustainability and for a decolonized approach to knowledge building. The webinar raised a number of themes that have potential implications for future discussions on evaluator competencies including: enhancing evaluation contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the need to rethink evaluation criteria, the need to embrace and address varieties of uncertainties, focus on diversity and heterogeneity; understanding the role of contexts in complex programs and policies; the need to reconceptualize sustainability; being more explicit about inequities and vulnerabilities; and the need to pay attention to systems and system dynamics.
Setting: The webinars were organized by the Evaluation Centre and the Asia Pacific Evaluation Association on a Zoom platform.
Intervention: Not applicable.
Research Design: Not applicable.
Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.
Findings: Not applicable.
Publisher
The Evaluation Center at Western Michigan University
Reference25 articles.
1. Anser, M. K., Godil, D. I., Khan, M. A., Nassani, A. A., Askar, S. E., Zaman, K., Salamun, H., Sasmoko, Indrianti, Y., & Abro, M. M. Q. (2022). Nonlinearity in the relationship between COVID-19 cases and carbon damages: controlling financial development, green energy, and R&D expenditures for shared prosperity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5648–5660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15978-w
2. Cayley, D., (2020). The Prognosis. Retrieved from https://reviewcanada.ca/magazine/2020/10/the-prognosis/
3. Cook, T. D. (2000). The false choice between theory-based evaluation and experimentation. New Directions in Evaluation, 87, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1179
4. Heider, C. (2017). Rethinking Evaluation – Have we had enough of R/E/E/I/S? https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/blog/rethinking-evaluation
5. Leviton, L. C., & Hughes, E. F. X. (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations: A review and synthesis. Evaluation Review, 5(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/01 93841X8100500405