Abstract
While the majority of the scientific community holds Marxian Value and Price Theory to be internally inconsistent because of the so-called “transformation problem”, these claims can be sufficiently refuted. The key to the solution of the “transformation problem” is quite simple, so this contribution, because it requires the rejection of simultanism and physicalism, which represent the genuine method of neoclassical economics, a method that is completely incompatible with Marxian Critique of Political Economy. Outside of the iron cage of neoclassical equilibrium economics, Marxian ‘Capital’ can be reconstructed without neoclassical “pathologies” and offers us a whole new world of analytical tools for a critical theory of capitalist societies and its dynamics.
Publisher
Vereinigung zur Kritik der politischen Okonomie e.V.
Reference33 articles.
1. Umit Akinci/Yigit Karahanogullari (2015): Convergence of monetary equivalent of labour times (MELTs) in two Marxian interpretations. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics 39(3): 769-781.
2. Berger, Johannes (1979): Ist die Marxsche Werttheorie eine Preistheorie? In: Leviathan 7(4): 560-565.
3. Von Bortkiewicz, Ladislaus (1976): Wertrechnung und Preisrechnung im Marxschen System (Etappen bürgerlicher Marx-Kritik, 2. Bd.). Lollar/Gießen.
4. Carchedi, Guglielmo (2011): Behind the Crisis. Marx's Dialectics of Value and Knowledge. Leiden-Boston.
5. Cogoy, Mario (1979): Traditionelle und neue Arbeitswerttheorie. In: Backhaus, Hans-Georg u.a. (Hg.): Gesellschaft. Beiträge zur Marxschen Theorie 13. Frankfurt/M: 115-139.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Die Grenze der Werttheorie;PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft;2018-06-11