Abstract
The noun phrase (NP), one of the key elements of a sentence, can reveal the characteristics of a learner’s linguistic competence. The present study focuses on actual decomposition of NP in the predicate construction. This is when the attribute elements of a noun phrase are included in the predicate construct as factor-actualized determinants. In this position, the copula verb is merely a grammatical means of allowing the attribute to become a predicate (Gaulmyn, Basset 1991: 177).The aim of the study being a more thorough investigation of the criteria and peculiarities of producing this type of predicate constructs in learner language, the present research is based on the empirical material from the Lithuanian learner corpus. The paper briefly discusses the concept of the predicate construction and describes the process of compiling the learner corpus as well as the principles of data selection. The analysis of the NP in a predicate construction is then presented, and the characteristic cases from the corpus data are examined. The main limitation of the present study is related to the scope of the learner corpus. Having summarized the results of the quantitative and qualitative research, the following conclusions were formulated. The learner language is dominated by NP predicate constructions with an adjective more often than a noun. As to the verb conjunction, the typical attribute verb être ‘to be’ was the only one widely used in the corpus under investigation. The analysis of the corpus data also revealed a number of specific errors that are typical of the learners’ written language. In general, the predictive constructions in the learners’ language are characterized by the omission of redundancy tags in the grammatical categories of gender and number. The analysis of the learner corpus provided a broader look at the NP in a predicate construction, highlighting the simplicity, conciseness and repetition of this construct. The results of the study are important for a more comprehensive description of the learners’ language, for solving problems in foreign language analysis, and for contributing to the quality of teaching and learning the French language.
Reference26 articles.
1. Baron, I. 1992. Les syntagmes nominaux complexes dans les textes juridiques français. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 5(9), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v5i9.21504
2. Bartning, I. 2000. Gender Agreement in L2 French: Pre-Advanced vs Advanced Learners. Studia Linguistica 54(2): 225-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00062
3. Chauvet, A., I. Normand, ed. 2008. Référentiel des contenus d'apprentissage du FLE en rapport avec les six niveaux du Conseil de l'Europe, à l'usage des enseignants de FLE. Paris: Alliance Française/CLE International.
4. Combettes, B. 1998. Les constructions détachées en français. Collection l'essentiel français. Gap: Ophrys.
5. Comrie, B. 1993. Argument structure. Jacobs, J., Von Stechov, A., Sternefeld, W., Vennemann, T., 1993, Syntax, 905-915. HSK 9.1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, Berlin NY.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献