Linking the Robo-advisors Phenomenon and Behavioural Biases in Investment Management: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review and Research Agenda

Author:

Lisauskiene NomedaORCID,Darskuviene ValdoneORCID

Abstract

Technological advancements bring continuous changes into the investment industry. The paper aims to provide insights on future research agenda based on a review of the current stance of research on the links between the Robo-advisors phenomenon and behavioural biases of individual investors. A qualitative investigation method has been applied for literature review on Robo-advisors and their impact on behavioural biases. The key findings indicate that Robo-advisors can help users to make better informed and less biased decisions. However, Robo-advisors activate the investors’ automatic system processes. The resulting passive investment approach could lead to alienation of the investors from the stock market, decreasing their understanding of the investment process that could widen a gap between different clusters of investors. The paper makes several contributions to the literature. First, it provides arguments on why a dual process theoretical framework in the relationship between financial advisory and investment behavioural biases is applicable. Second, it studies the Robo-advisor phenomenon and proposes a comprehensive definition of Robo-advisors. Third, the literature review suggests drivers of the Robo-advisors effect on the changes of behavioural biases as a future research direction.

Publisher

Vilnius University Press

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Development,Business and International Management

Reference71 articles.

1. Abraham, F., Schmukler, S. L., & Tessada, J. (2019). Robo-Advisors: Investing through Machines. Research and Policy Briefs (134881). The World Bank.

2. Adam, M., Toutaoui, J., Pfeuffer, N., & Hinz, O. (2019). Investment Decisions with Robo-advisors: The Role of Anthropomorphism and Personalized Anchors in Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Upsala, Sweden, June 8-14. https://aisel. aisnet. org/ecis2019_rp/33.

3. Alsabah, H., Capponi, A., Ruiz Lacedelli, O., & Stern, M. (2019). Robo-Advising: Learning Investors' Risk Preferences via Portfolio Choices. Journal of Financial Econometrics. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3228685

4. Au, C.-D., & Krahnhof, P. (2020). The Role of Robo-Advisors in the German Banking Market-Critical Analysis on Human Versus Digital Advisory Services. In Proceedings of IASTEM International Conference, Brussels, Belgium, Institute for Technology and Research.

5. Baker, T. (2018). Regulating Robo Advice Across the Financial Services Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2932189

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3