Abstract
Alter (2016) elaborates and defends an ambitious argument advanced by Chalmers (2002) against physicalism. As Alter notes, the argument is valid. But I will argue that not all its premises are true. In particular, it is false that all physical truths are purely structural. In denying this, I focus not on the objects of pure physical theory but on the homely, macroscopic objects of our daily lives.
Subject
Philosophy,General Materials Science
Reference16 articles.
1. Alter, T., 2016. The Structure and Dynamics Argument against Materialism. Nôus 50 (4): 794-815, https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12134.
2. Chalmers, D. J., 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Chalmers, D. J., 2002. Consciousness and Its Place in Nature. In: Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. 247-272.
4. Chalmers, D. J., 2015. Minimizing the Base. In: Constructing the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 312-378.
5. Churchland, P. M., 1979. Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.