Abstract
Media are essential actors in transmitting, contesting and embedding the attitudes towards climate change, yet media performance in post-communist countries has been relatively little researched. Informed by conceptual frameworks of strategic narratives, agenda-setting and framing, this paper investigates the media coverage of climate change and environment related issues in Latvia. The paper demonstrates the representation of climate change and environment related issues in Latvian and Russian-speaking traditional and online media, using quantitative data analysis of 3753 media articles, video and audio broadcasts from August 2020 till January 2021, as well as qualitative content analysis of seven peaks. The findings reveal a significant amount of climate change and environment related articles and broadcasts in Latvian media. News agencies and public broadcasters are the most important media segments in terms of publishing, whereas online media are prior in terms of the audiences reached. International efforts emerge as a dominant theme in the media coverage, while climate change per se receives a minor journalist attention. Both observations confirm a low level of climate change domestication in the Latvian media. Media reliance on political and government information sources and prepackaged material suggests a high potential for official political narratives to spread, yet the persuasive power of strategic narratives remains blurred as the perception side is highly underreported.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems and Management,Political Science and International Relations,General Physics and Astronomy,Sociology and Political Science,Media Technology
Reference37 articles.
1. Source influence on journalistic decisions and news coverage of climate change;Anderson;In M C Nisbet (Ed ) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science Vol,2018
2. Berglez, P., & Lidskog, R. (2019). Foreign, Domestic, and Cultural Factors in Climate Change Reporting: Swedish Media's Coverage of Wildfires in Three Continents. Environmental Communication, 13(3), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1397040
3. Boussalis, C., Travis, G. C., & Poberezhskaya, M. (2016). Measuring and modeling Russian newspaper coverage of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 41, 99-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.09.004
4. Boykoff, M. T., McNatt, M. M., & Goodman, M. K. (2015). Communicating in the anthropocene: The cultural politics of climate change news coverage around the world. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication (pp. 221-232). Routledge Press.
5. Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2014). Between Consensus and Denial: Climate Journalists as Interpretive Community. Science Communication, 36(4), 399-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014533662
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献