The Opportunities and Limitations of Using Artificial Neural Networks in Social Science Research

Author:

Pukelis Lukas,Stančiauskas Vilius

Abstract

Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are being increasingly used in various disciplines outside computer science, such as bibliometrics, linguistics, and medicine. However, their uptake in the social science community has been relatively slow, because these highly non-linear models are difficult to interpret and cannot be used for hypothesis testing. Despite the existing limitations, this paper argues that the social science community can benefit from using ANNs in a number of ways, especially by outsourcing laborious data coding and pre-processing tasks to machines in the early stages of analysis. Using ANNs would enable small teams of researchers to process larger quantities of data and undertake more ambitious projects. In fact, the complexity of the pre-processing tasks that ANNs are able to perform mean that researchers could obtain rich and complex data typically associated with qualitative research at a large scale, allowing to combine the best from both qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Publisher

Vilnius University Press

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference32 articles.

1. Baer Tobias and Vishnu Kamalnath, "Controlling Machine-Learning Algorithms and Their Biases," Mckinsey Blog, , 10 10 2018.

2. Bansal S., "How Autoencoders Work - Understanding the Math and Implementation," , 10 10 2018.

3. Blei David M., Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I., "Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 2003, p. 993-1022.

4. Conroy Niall J., Victoria L. Rubin, and Yimin Chen, "Automatic Deception Detection: Methods for Finding Fake News," Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 52 (1), 2015, p.1-4, .

5. Crawford Kate, "The Hidden Biases in Big Data," , 10 10 2018.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3