Author:
Rimaitė-Beržiūnienė Viktorija
Abstract
In 2008 and 2014 the Russian-Georgian war, the military conflict in Ukraine, and the annexation of Crimea have had an impact on Lithuanian foreign and security policy. In the context of these events, Lithuania was concerned about the mobilization of conventional security measures, i.e., strengthening its national defense sector. However, the role as well as the impact of “soft” (unconventional) response devices and strategies in the Lithuanian case has still received little academic interest. This paper, using the analysis of visual collective memory practices (monuments), aims to show the links between collective memory as well as its visually tangible forms and the formation of foreign and security policy in Lithuania. By examining the visual practices reminiscent of guerrilla warfare built in Lithuanian public spaces after 2014, it is revealed how the use of collective memory contributed to the perceived threat from Russia, which had a significant impact on the formation and implementation of foreign and security policy.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference58 articles.
1. "Atminimo ženklai, simboliai, paminklai". Lietuvos gyventojų genocido ir rezistencijos tyrimų centras. http://genocid.lt/centras/lt/810/c/.
2. "Jonavoje pastatytas paminklas žuvusiems už laisvę". Mano kraštas (2018 m. rugpjūčio 6 d.). https://www.manokrastas.lt/straipsnis/jonavoje-pastatytas-paminklas-zuvusiems-uz-laisve.
3. "Lietuvos valstybės simboliai". Lietuvos Respublikos Seimas. https://www.lrs.lt/sip/portal.show?p_r=35580&p_k=1.
4. "Rusija pažėrė kaltinimų G. Nausėdai "istoriniu revizionizmu". BNS (2021 m. liepos 23 d.). https://www.bns.lt/topic/1912/news/61765539/.
5. Adams, Tracy. "Sharing the Same Space: How the Memory of the Holocaust Travels in Political Speech". The Sociological Quarterly (2020): 1-20.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献