Author:
Kuokštis Vytautas,Vilpišauskas Ramūnas
Abstract
Viewed in light of democratic corporatism literature, Lithuania is a deviant case. Although it lacks essential institutional prerequisites deemed important for export success and flexible adaptation to external shocks, the small Baltic country has been among the best performers in the European Union on these dimensions. Lithuania has become very internationally integrated and has managed to quickly adjust to numerous shocks, such as the Russian financial crisis of 1998–99, the Global Financial Crisis of 2008–2009, and the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, we analyse Lithuania’s export specialization and show how particular institutional elements have supported flexible adaptation and competitiveness improvements: we cover the labour market, state’s involvement in terms of domestic compensation and public goods provision, education and skills, and the role of political legitimacy. Lithuania’s case has implications for the literature on the political economy of small states and the debate regarding the middle-income trap.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference76 articles.
1. Aleknevičiūtė, Eglė. "Vidutinių pajamų spąstai: apibrėžimas, ribos ir pritaikomumas Lietuvai." In Lietuvos ekonominės konvergencijos ir darbo rinkos iššūkiai, Lietuvos banko teminių straipsnių serija Nr. 31. Vilnius: Lietuvos bankas. 2020, 12-22.
2. Avlijaš, Sonja. "Beyond Neoliberalism? Revisiting the Welfare State in the Baltic States." Europe-Asia Studies 72, no. 4 (2020): 614-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1709622 .
3. Baccaro, Lucio and Jonas Pontusson. "Rethinking Comparative Political Economy: The Growth Model Perspective." Politics & Society 44, no. 2 (2016): 175-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216638053.
4. Bank of Lithuania. Lithuanian Economic Review. September 2019. Vilnius: Bank of Lithuania, 2019.
5. Bohle, Dorothe. "European Integration, Capitalist Diversity and Crises Trajectories on Europe's Eastern Periphery." New Political Economy 23, no. 2 (2018): 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1370448.