The Home Care Home – An Un-Total Institution. When the Care Home Logic Permeates the Private Space

Author:

Möllergren GlennORCID

Abstract

This article examines how the provision of home care services impact older individuals in Sweden, focusing on how it may subtly institutionalise their daily lives. Domiciliary care is found to negatively impact users’ individuality and independence, contrary to initial intentions of offering an emancipatory alternative to nursing facilities. The study uses Goffman’s concept of total institutions, operationalised by identifying aspects of everyday life within which institutionalisation manifests itself, including meals, daily rhythmics, and lifestyle choices. For this article, the experiences of home care users in Sweden were collected in 34 qualitative interviews and 15 observations with respondents aged between 68 and 96 years. The material was examined using theory-driven thematic analysis. Results show that while some care users find comfort in the structures imposed to their lives, many are faced with limitations related to the tight, minute-timed scheduling and the assembly-line style of care provision. The constraints affect everyday life choices related to eating, sleeping hours, hobbies, and the sense of home, which are all influenced by the care organisation’s work regime and scheduling. The analysis concludes by proposing the term “home care home”. This designation indicates the challenges to individuality entailed in the home care rationale, while acknowledging that the influence on users is “less-than-total”, as compared to typical institutionalising environments such as prisons or hospitals. While a total institution is commonly understood as a spatial structure, it also functions as a logic acting regardless of physical constraints – for instance, in a person’s home. Moreover, the study suggests that this logic may be at work anywhere within large-scale production of human services. In summary, this article addresses the individuality-eroding force ingrained in home care provision and emphasises the need to strengthen users’ influence on care provision in order to increase their independence.

Publisher

Vilnius University Press

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3