Identification of Material Misstatement and Specific Risk Factors in an Audit of Financial Statements

Author:

Žukauskaitė Deimantė,Daujotaitė Dalia

Abstract

Recently, due to the changing geopolitical situation, economic instability and vulnerability, practicing auditors are facing new challenges that affect the identification and assessment of risks of material misstatement of financial statements. The purpose of the research is to identify the main factors affecting the risk of material misstatement and specific risks (fraud, accounting estimates, and going concern) that auditors should consider when deciding on the level of the risk of material misstatement of financial statements. To achieve the goal, two tasks were set: to compile lists of factors affecting the risk of material misstatement and specific risks; conduct a questionnaire survey to confirm the compiled lists. The following research methods were used during the research: content analysis and systematization of scientific and normative literature, comparison, logical analysis, questionnaire survey and summarization. As a result of the research, lists of the main factors determining the risk of material misstatement and specific risks were compiled, the completeness of which was confirmed during a questionnaire survey of auditors and auditor assistants working in Lithuanian audit companies. The results of the research show the necessary need for a more thorough assessment of specific risks. Compiled lists of factors determining the risk of material misstatement and specific risks can be useful for auditors of audit companies to assess the risk of material misstatement of financial statements.

Publisher

Vilnius University Press

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Akresh, A. D., 2010. A risk model to opine on internal control. Accounting Horizons. 24(1), 65-78. http://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.1.65.

2. Arzhenovskiy, S. V.; Bakhteev, A. V.; Sinyavskaya, T. G.; Hahonova, N. N., 2019. Audit risk assessment model. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration. VII, Special Issue 1, 74-85. Prieiga per: < https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vviiy2019ispecial1p74-85.html>.

3. Bilevičienė, T.; Jonušauskas, S., 2011. Statistinių metodų taikymas rinkos tyrimuose. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas. Prieiga per: < https://repository.mruni.eu/bitstream/handle/007/16758/%209789955192770.pdf?sequence=1>.

4. COVID-19: Reminders for Audits Nearing Completion Spotlight, 2020. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). Prieiga per: [žiūrėta 2021 07 02].

5. Dėl geopolitinės situacijos įtakos 2021 m. finansinių ataskaitų auditams, 2022. Lietuvos auditorių rūmų Audito komiteto pranešimas. Prieiga per: [žiūrėta 2022 03 24].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3