Identification of key qualitative characteristics used to assess the significance of misstatements identified in the financial statements

Author:

Masiulevičius Audrius

Abstract

Financial statements may be misstated for quantitative reasons, such as mathematically incorrect reporting of assets, liabilities or other. Misstatements in the financial statements may also be qualitative. It is the qualitative characteristics of the misstatement that reflect the significance of the misstatement not for mathematical magnitude, but for other reasons, such as changes in profitability trends or illegal activities. To date, auditors have dedicated more attention to the quantitative characteristics of misstatements and the qualitative characteristics have not been adequately assessed. And although the problem is well known to scientists and practitioners, little action has been taken to date. The objective of the study reflected in this article is to identify the key qualitative characteristics that auditors should consider in deciding the significance of the misstatements identified in the financial statements. A list of fifteen key qualitative characteristics was compiled during the study and the completeness of the list was confirmed by an expert survey. The list of key qualitative characteristics will not only assist the auditors in deciding on the significance of the misstatements identified but may also be used in further research to deepen the scientific knowledge of the qualitative characteristics.

Publisher

Vilnius University Press

Subject

General Medicine

Reference52 articles.

1. 3000-asis TUUS (persvarstytas) "Užtikrinimo užduotys, išskyrus istorinės finansinės informacijos auditus ar peržvalgas" (2014) // International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)

2. 450-asis TAS "Audito metu nustatytų iškraipymų vertinimas" (2009) // International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)

3. Acito, A. A., Burks, J. J., Johnson, W. B. (2019). The Materiality of Accounting Errors: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters // Contemporary Accounting Research. Vol. 36, No. 2, p. 839-868. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12458

4. Altiero, C. E., Kang, Ju Y., Peecher, E. M. (2021). Motivated Perspective Taking: Why Prompting Auditors to Take an Investor's Perspective Makes Them Treat Identified Audit Differences as Less Material // Contemporary Accounting Research. Accepted, 56 p. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12721

5. AS 2810 "Evaluating Audit Results" (2010) // Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3