Abstract
This article is about the legal personhood of artificial intelligence as one of the existing options of regulating AI and coping with the challenges arising out of its functioning. It begins with the search for the definition of AI and goes on to consider the arguments against the legal personhood of AI, the options of such a legal personhood, and the factors taken into account in devising the legal personhood of AI. The article ends with our vision of the legal personhood of AI.
Reference18 articles.
1. Banteka, N. (2021). Artificially Intelligent Persons. Houston law review, 58 (3), 537-596.
2. Brundage, et al. (2018). The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation, https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.22520
3. Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence;Čerka;The computer law and security report,2015
4. Darling, K. (2015). Who's Johnny? Anthropomorphic Framing in Human-Robot Interaction, Integration, and Policy. In: Lin, P., Bekey, G., Abney, K. and Jenkins, R. (eds) (2017). Robot Ethics 2.0. Oxford University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588669
5. Dremliuga, R., Kuznetcov, P. and Mamychev, A. (2019). Criteria for Recognition of AI as a Legal Person. Journal of politics and law (Toronto), 12(3), p. 105-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v12n3p105