Abstract
The present article analyses the extent of influence the adopted Article of the Law on Public Administration of the Republic of Lithuania (Art. 368, currently Art. 37), which systematises the basic procedural rights of business entities, has on the protection of business entities’ procedural rights, which are assured by the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania in its case law. The precise provisions invoked as basis for procedural rights protection in the case law of the Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania regarding sanctions imposed on business entities are showcased. Furthermore, the results and plausible reasons for the application or non-application of procedural rights systematized in the Law on Public Administration are appraised.
Reference46 articles.
1. Andrijauskaitė, A. (2016). Teisė būti išklausytam - kelias geresnių administracinių procedūrų link. Lietuvos vyriausiojo administracinio teismo biuletenis, 31, 555-573.
2. Andrijauskaitė, A. (2017). Creating Good Administration by Persuasion: A Case Study of the Recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. International Public Administration Review, 15, 3-4, 39-58.
3. Andrijauskaitė, A. (2018). Meduolis ar botagas? Geras administravimas kitaip. Lietuvos vyriausiojo administracinio teismo biuletenis, 34, 401-415.
4. Andrijauskaitė, A. (2019). Exploring the penumbra of punishment under the ECHR. New Journal of European criminal Law, 10, 4, 363-375 1-13, doi:10.1177/2032284419868789.
5. Andrijauskaitė, A. (2020). Procedural Rights in Lithuanian Administrative Law - (Still) An Uncharted Territory? [interaktyvus]. Prieiga per internetą: https://droit-public.ulb.ac.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Workshop-Report-final.pdf [žiūrėta 2020 m. rugpjūčio 30 d.].