Legal Status of the Prosecutor’s Office in Ukraine

Author:

Lapkin AndriiORCID

Abstract

The scientific article is devoted to the study of the legal status of the Prosecutor’s Office in Ukraine in the context of the development of judicial reform.The historical development of the Prosecutor’s Office during the independence of Ukraine, which was carried out by transforming from the Soviet model of “supervision service” to the model of the “prosecution service” established in Europe, is analyzed.The problems of determining the place of prosecutor’s office in the system of division of state power of Ukraine are investigated. The understanding of the prosecutor’s office as adjacent to the judicial authority of the legal institute is substantiated.The purpose and objectives of the prosecutor’s office, as well as the system of its functions, are described. The problems of functional appointment of the prosecutor’s office, as well as regulation of its functions are revealed.The system of prosecutor’s office is defined and its elements are characterized. The main links of the prosecutor’s office, as well as the division of prosecutors into territorial and specialized ones are investigated.

Publisher

Vilnius University Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,General Medicine

Reference7 articles.

1. Bryntsev, V. D. (2010). Standarty pravovoi derzhavy: vtilennia u natsionalnu model orhanizatsiinoho zabezpechennia sudovoi vlady [Standards of the Legal State: Implementation of the Organizational Support of the Judiciary into the National Model]. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].

2. Khotynska-Nor, O. Z. (2016). Vplyv maloi sudovoi reformy na rozvytok sudovoi systemy Ukrainy: orhanizatsiini aspekty [The Impact of Small Judicial Reform on the Development of the Judicial System of Ukraine: Organizational Aspects]. Sudova apeliatsiia [Judicial Appeal], 1, 6-15 [in Ukrainian].

3. Marochkin, I. Ye. (2011). Prokuratura Ukrainy: problemy stanovlennia y rozvytku [Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine: problems of formation and development]. Yuryst Ukrainy [Lawyer of Ukraine], 2, 62-68 [in Ukrainian].

4. Rudenko, M. V., Melnyk, O. V. (2016). Orhanizatsiino-pravovi osnovy spetsializovanoi antykoruptsiinoi prokuratury [Organizational and legal basis of specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriia «Pravo» [Bulletin of Kharkiv National University named after V.N. Karazin. Series "Law"], 21, 173-176 [in Ukrainian].

5. Solomon, Jr P. H., Foglesong, T. S. (2000). The Procuracy and the Courts in Russia: A New Relationship? East European Constitutional Review, 9, 105-117 [in English].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3