Abstract
The paper examines the application of Artificial Intelligence systems in the judicial environments. It provides an outline of a typology of different algorithms applicable in judicial environments depending on judicial decision-making stage. This is a positive analysis which aims at identifying relevant algorithms in every judicial decision-making stage, be it assessing the facts, indicating the applicable law or deciding.
Reference23 articles.
1. Aletras, N. et al. (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective, PeerJ Computer Science, 2:e93, 2016 [interaktyvus], Prieiga per internetą: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93 [žiūrėta 2019 m. gruodžio 17 d.].
2. Arbseman, S. (2017). Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of Comprehension. Portfolio.
3. Barak, A. (2006). Teisėjo vaidmuo demokratinėje valstybėje. Konstitucinė jurisprudencija, Nr. 1.
4. Carneiro, D. et al. (2014). Online Dispute Resolution: an Artificial Intelligence Perspective, 41(2) Artificial Intelligence Review, 211.
5. Contini, F.; Cordella, A. (2017). Law and Technology in Civil Procedures. In The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation, and Technology, eds. R. Brownsword et al., OUP.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献