Abstract
The article discusses the crisis of the political, treating this phenomenon as an interactive constellation of political, over-political and apolitical factors. The aim is to reconstruct the assumptions of the crisis and highlight its main features in the context of ancient Greece. Under the influence of Dionysian religion, theater was established as a compelling and universally accessible authority to legitimize democracy. Therefore my analysis focuses on the social change after which democracy was no longer perceived as a form of governance but as a form of collective ownership. The article explains how the unbridled demonstration of power quickly erased the long-cherished principle of verbal argumentation and pushed Greeks to practice of power politics. It is shown how, with the establishment of autocracy, parallel interchange between political and anti-political institutions emerged in the Greek polis.
Reference164 articles.
1. Andrewes, Antony. 1956. Greek Tyrants. London: Hutchinson's University Library.
2. Arnason, Johann P. 2001. "Autonomy and Axiality. Comparative Perspectives on the Greek Breakthrough" in Johann Arnason and Peter Murphy (eds.) Agon, Logos, Polis. The Greek Achievement and its Aftermath. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag: 155-206.
3. Asmonti, Luca. 2015. "Gentrifying the Demos. Aristocratic Principles and Democratic Culture in Ancient Athens", Studi Classici e Orientale 61 (1): 55-75.
4. Athanassaki, Lucia. 2018. "The Cult of Peace on the Athenian Stage during the Peloponnesian War. From Euripides's Cresphontes to Aristophanes's Peace and Beyond", Illinois Classical Studies 43 (1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5406/illiclasstud.43.1.0001
5. Baldry, Harold C. 1965. The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735851
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献