STEM Education: From Sputnik to Girl Scouts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

STEM Education: From Sputnik to Girl Scouts

Published:2019-12-20 Issue: Volume:43 Page:100-118
ISSN:1648-665X
Container-title:Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia
language:
Short-container-title:ActPaed

Author:

Vaitekaitis Jogaila

Abstract

The inconsistency of defining STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) education is being addressed in this article. Seeing STEM education as having implications ranging from migration to workforce policies, it is vital to clarify its (inter)disciplinary structure and curriculum orientation. Using a literature review and analysis of documents, STEM education is being tracked from a post-sputnik era to more recent informal and private endeavors, revealing a multiplication of the STEM acronym and the diversification of its curriculum orientation. The findings confirm that there is no consensus on the exact scientific fields assigned to STEM, and the list of disciplines involved ranges from broad (including Social sciences, Humanities or Arts) to narrow (dominated by Natural and Formal sciences). The article implies that historical context and reforms in natural science education partly explain this inconsistency, as the subjects and their interdisciplinary relations are closely linked to overall curriculum orientation, which could be seen as cyclical in nature, swinging from child centered to labor market or subject centered curriculum, inviting to discuss modern science education not as singular STEM, but as plural STEMs viable to multiple pedagogical approaches, integration patterns and aims.

Publisher

Vilnius University Press

Subject

Education

Reference45 articles.

1. Breiner, J., Harkness, S., Johnson, C., Koehler, C. (2012). What Is STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships. School Science And Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x

2. Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students Who Study Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Postsecondary Education. [žiūrėta 2019-07-23]. Prieiga per internetą: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009161.pdf

3. Colucci-Gray, L., Trowsdale, J., Cooke, C. F., Davies, R., Burnard, P., Gray, D. S. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: how can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? British Educational research Association.

4. Czerniak, C. M. (2007). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In S. Abell, ir N., Lederman (Eds.) Handbook of research on science education. (pp.537-559). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

5. DeBoer, G. E. (2014). The history of science curriculum reform in the United States. In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 559-578). Abingdon: Routledge.