MASKED AND UNMASKED FACE RECOGNITION ON UNCONSTRAINED FACIAL IMAGES USING HAND-CRAFTED METHODS
-
Published:2023-12-12
Issue:Özel Sayı
Volume:26
Page:1133-1139
-
ISSN:1309-1751
-
Container-title:Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi
-
language:tr
-
Short-container-title:KSU J. Eng. Sci.
Author:
TORBATI Ali1ORCID, TOYGAR Önsen1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. DOĞU AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
In this study, the face recognition task is applied on masked and unmasked faces using hand-crafted methods. Due to COVID-19 and masks, facial identification from unconstrained images became a hot topic. To avoid COVID-19, most people use masks outside. In many cases, typical facial recognition technology is useless. The majority of contemporary advanced face recognition methods are based on deep learning, which primarily relies on a huge number of training examples, however, masked face recognition may be investigated using hand-crafted approaches at a lower computing cost than using deep learning systems. A low-cost system is intended to be constructed for recognizing masked faces and compares its performance to that of face recognition systems that do not use masks. The proposed method fuses hand-crafted methods using feature-level fusion strategy. This study compares the performance of masked and unmasked face recognition systems. The experiments are undertaken on two publicly accessible datasets for masked face recognition: Masked Labeled Faces in the Wild (MLFW) and Cross-Age Labeled Faces in the Wild (CALFW). The best accuracy is achieved as 94.8% on MLFW dataset. The rest of the results on different train and test sets from CALFW and MLFW datasets are encouraging compared to the state-of-the-art models.
Publisher
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Journal of Engineering Sciences
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference12 articles.
1. Ahamed, H., Alam, I. and Islam, M. M. (2018), HOG-CNN Based Real Time Face Recognition, 2018 International Conference on Advancement in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ICAEEE), 2018, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ICAEEE.2018.8642989. 2. Cao, Q., Shen, L., Xie, W., Parkhi, O. M. and Zisserman, A. (2018), VGGFace2: A Dataset for Recognising Faces across Pose and Age, 2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018), Xi'an, China, 2018, pp. 67-74, doi: 10.1109/FG.2018.00020. 3. Deng, J., Guo, J., Xue, N. and Zafeiriou, S. (2019), ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019, pp. 4685-4694, doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00482. 4. Guo, Y., Zhang, L., Hu, Y., He, X., and Gao, J. (2016), MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognition, Sep. 17, 2016. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-46487-9-6 5. Huang, Y. et al. (2020), CurricularFace: Adaptive Curriculum Learning Loss for Deep Face Recognition, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision andPattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 2020, pp. 5900-5909, doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00594.
|
|