Affiliation:
1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada R7A 5Y3
2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland, British Columbia, Canada V0H 1Z0
3. Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6X 0B3
4. Box 83 Rivers, Manitoba, Canada R0K 1X0
Abstract
Khakbazan, M., Carew, R., Scott, S. L., Chiang, P., Block, H. C., Robins, C., Durunna, O. N. and Huang, J. 2014. Economic analysis and stochastic simulation of alternative beef calving and feeding systems in western Canada. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 94: 299–311. Biological and economic data from three field-experimental sites in Manitoba (Brandon Research Centre) and Saskatchewan (Western Beef Development Centre; Semi-Arid Prairie Agriculture Research Centre) were used to determine the economic and financial benefits of alternative beef calving and feeding systems. Stochastic budgets and Monte Carlo simulation techniques were used to evaluate the profitability and risk levels of four alternative livestock beef management systems: early-calving/rapid-gain post-weaning feeding (ER), late-calving/rapid-gain post-weaning feeding (LR), early-calving/slow-gain post-weaning feeding (ES), and late-calving/slow-gain post-weaning feeding (LS). Economic budgets were constructed to evaluate the viability of different phases of beef production including backgrounding, pasture, swath grazing and finishing. Statistical analysis considered operational costs (feed, yardage, implants, medicine, labor, marketing, and other costs), price variables (fed-steer, feeder cattle, and grid pricing premiums/discounts) and steer performance measures such as average daily gain (ADG). Results from the simulation analysis revealed that late-calving systems provided higher returns for livestock producers, while rapid-feeding systems were more preferable for producers who were more risk-averse.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Food Animals
Reference34 articles.
1. Adams, D. C., Clark, D., Sandberg, R., Carriker, G., Klopfenstein T. J. and Milton, T. 2001. June versus March calving for the Nebraska Sandhills – production traits. Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports. Paper 284. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
2. Expected Utility Analysis of Stocker Cattle Ownership Versus Contract Grazing in the Southeast
3. Ascough II, J. C., Fathelrahman, E. H., Vandenberg, B. C., Green, T. R. and Hoag, D. L. 2009. Economic risk analysis of agriculture tillage systems using the SMART stochastic efficiency software package. 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia.
4. Manipulation of cattle growth to target carcass quality.
5. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. CCAC, Ottawa, ON.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献