Economic analysis and stochastic simulation of alternative beef calving and feeding systems in western Canada

Author:

Khakbazan Mohammad1,Carew Richard2,Scott Shannon L.3,Chiang Paul2,Block Hushton C.1,Robins Clayton4,Durunna Obioha N.1,Huang John1

Affiliation:

1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada R7A 5Y3

2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland, British Columbia, Canada V0H 1Z0

3. Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6X 0B3

4. Box 83 Rivers, Manitoba, Canada R0K 1X0

Abstract

Khakbazan, M., Carew, R., Scott, S. L., Chiang, P., Block, H. C., Robins, C., Durunna, O. N. and Huang, J. 2014. Economic analysis and stochastic simulation of alternative beef calving and feeding systems in western Canada. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 94: 299–311. Biological and economic data from three field-experimental sites in Manitoba (Brandon Research Centre) and Saskatchewan (Western Beef Development Centre; Semi-Arid Prairie Agriculture Research Centre) were used to determine the economic and financial benefits of alternative beef calving and feeding systems. Stochastic budgets and Monte Carlo simulation techniques were used to evaluate the profitability and risk levels of four alternative livestock beef management systems: early-calving/rapid-gain post-weaning feeding (ER), late-calving/rapid-gain post-weaning feeding (LR), early-calving/slow-gain post-weaning feeding (ES), and late-calving/slow-gain post-weaning feeding (LS). Economic budgets were constructed to evaluate the viability of different phases of beef production including backgrounding, pasture, swath grazing and finishing. Statistical analysis considered operational costs (feed, yardage, implants, medicine, labor, marketing, and other costs), price variables (fed-steer, feeder cattle, and grid pricing premiums/discounts) and steer performance measures such as average daily gain (ADG). Results from the simulation analysis revealed that late-calving systems provided higher returns for livestock producers, while rapid-feeding systems were more preferable for producers who were more risk-averse.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Food Animals

Reference34 articles.

1. Adams, D. C., Clark, D., Sandberg, R., Carriker, G., Klopfenstein T. J. and Milton, T. 2001. June versus March calving for the Nebraska Sandhills – production traits. Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports. Paper 284. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.

2. Expected Utility Analysis of Stocker Cattle Ownership Versus Contract Grazing in the Southeast

3. Ascough II, J. C., Fathelrahman, E. H., Vandenberg, B. C., Green, T. R. and Hoag, D. L. 2009. Economic risk analysis of agriculture tillage systems using the SMART stochastic efficiency software package. 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia.

4. Manipulation of cattle growth to target carcass quality.

5. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. CCAC, Ottawa, ON.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3