Reviewing/editing a manuscript for scientific publication

Abstract

The peer review process is the basis of evaluation or "quality control" in modern science. Peer review ensures publication of valid scientific results that are appropriately presented and interpreted. As scientists, we benefit from and are expected to review the work of our colleagues. A request to review a manuscript recognizes the reviewer's expertise as an authority or leader in a field of research. The capacity to conduct a good review enhances one's reputation and career advancement, and is well worth the effort expended. Manuscripts submitted to the Agricultural Institute of Canada (AIC) scientific journals are logged and monitored through a centralized processing system. A primary goal of the journals is to review manuscripts within 90 d of submission. Good reviews provide a constructive and well-reasoned appraisal of a manuscript phrased in the spirit of professional courtesy and confidentiality. Both anonymity of the reviewer and confidentiality of manuscript contents must be maintained in the peer review process. Any question of conflict of interest or ethical standing of a reviewer or duplication of publication should be directed to the editor immediately. Editors, authors, and reviewers are important partners in the peer review process. Key words: Peer review, manuscript processing, scientific journals