Examination of Science and Art Center Course Materials According to Maker Differentiation Principles

Author:

Kaynar Hamza1ORCID,Kurnaz Ahmet2ORCID,Şentürk Barışık Canan3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY

3. Akşehir Bilim ve Sanat Merkezi

Abstract

The main factor in the emergence of this research is that the current educational materials prepared for gifted students are not based on a theoretical basis, curriculum differentiation and models are not taken into consideration in the preparation of activities for gifted students, gifted education principles are not reflected in the curricula, and applications related to gifted students are not monitored and evaluated. This study aims to examine the activities included in the supplementary course materials prepared for Science and Technology in Science and Art Centers according to the Maker-Banks Differentiated Instruction Assessment Model. In line with the research objective, a total of 31 activities in the field of science and technology were examined for students included in the support education program prepared in 2022 by the Directorate General of Special Education and Guidance Services. The "Instruction Program Evaluation Form According to the Maker-Banks Model" was used as the data collection tool. It was concluded that the activities included in the supplementary course materials prepared for Science and Technology in Science and Art Centers do not meet the content and process conditions according to the Maker-Banks Differentiated Instruction Assessment Model. It was found that the activities met the conditions of economy, reasoning, teaching pace, openness, exploratory learning, higher-order thinking, real-life problems, and product evaluation. When new activities and materials are prepared for gifted students, the criteria that were weak in the Maker-Banks Model in this study can be strengthened. The qualities of the prepared activities can be evaluated according to the criteria in the Maker-Banks Model. It is believed that this study will pave the way for new studies by evaluating activities prepared for areas other than science and technology and for different grade levels according to the criteria in the Maker-Banks Model.

Publisher

Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning

Reference30 articles.

1. Ataman, A. (1998). Üstün zekâlılar ve üstün yetenekliler. In S. Eripek (Ed.), Anadolu University Publications

2. Avcı, E. (2015). Dijital sanat bağlamında dijital teknolojilerin güzel sanatlar eğitimine entegrasyonu: bir eylem araştırması Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.

3. Bowen, G. A. (2005). Local-level stakeholder collaboration: a substantive theory of community driven development. Journal of the Community Development Society, 36(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.10.1080/15575330509490176

4. Bozkurt, A., Özmantar, M. F., & Özbey, N. (2019). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri matematik çerçeve programında yer verilen etkinliklerdeki yöntem ve tekniklerin incelenmesi. Congress Papers, 19

5. Çaylak, B. (2009). Bilim ve sanat merkezlerinde uygulanan fen bilimleri etkinliklerinin incelenmesi. Unpublished Master's Thesis, İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3