An investigation of the efficacy of different disinfectants on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from fish processing plant
-
Published:2023-09-15
Issue:3
Volume:40
Page:228-234
-
ISSN:2148-3140
-
Container-title:Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:EgeJFAS
Author:
Besler AysuORCID, Kılınç BernaORCID
Abstract
Healthy and safe food production is an important issue for processing plants that export internationally. With cleaning and disinfection, the number of bacteria that can contaminate fish by coming from various sources at every stage of the processing plant is kept to a minimum. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effective concentrations of different disinfectants on the bacterial strains forming the resident microflora of the fish processing plant. In the study, the effectiveness of 4 different disinfectants (chlorine, quaternary ammonium compounds, gluteraldehyde and hydrogen peroxide) was termined on bacteria isolated from different parts of the fish processing plant. The antimicrobial efficacy of different disinfectant concentrations was determined by the Quantitative Suspension Assay. In our study, it was determined that all disinfectants were effective on bacteria isolated at 2% concentration. It was determined that chlorine compounds did not show bactericidal activity at low concentrations (0.5%, 1%) on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates. The effectiveness of quaternary ammonium-based disinfectants on all isolates and hydrogen peroxide compounds on P. fluorescens at all concentrations was determined.
Publisher
Ege University Faculty of Fisheries
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference36 articles.
1. Al-Saleh, S., Albaqawi, A.H., Alrawi, F., Tulbah, H.I., Al-Qahtani, A.S., Heer, E., Nisar, S.S., Vohra, F., & Abduljabbar, T. (2021). Effectiveness of synthetic and natural photosensitizers and different chemical disinfectants on the contaminated metal crown. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 36(11), 102601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102601 2. Anderson, S.E.A., Shane, H., Long, C., Lukomska, E., Meade, B.J., & Marshall, N.B. (2016). Evaluation of the irritancy and hypersensitivity potential following topical application of didecyldimethylammonium chloride. Journal of Immunotoxicology, 13(4), 557 566. https://doi.org/10.3109/1547691X.2016.1140854 3. Arda, M. (2000). Basic Microbiology (in Turkish) (pp.95-99). İkinci baskı (Genişletilmiş). Medisan Yayın Serisi:46, Ankara. 4. Avcı, D., & Otkun, M. (2017). Evalution of antibacterial activities of some antiseptics and disinfectants. (in Turkish with English abstract). Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 74(3), 211 220. https://doi.org/10.5505/TurkHijyen.2017.75002 5. Beeharry, M., Goburdhun, D., & Neetoo, H. (2016). Comparative efficacy of chlorinated and non-chlorinated disinfectants on food contact surfaces in a tuna processing area. International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences, 5(7), 1743-1754. ISSN:2277-4998
|
|