Diş Hekimliğinde Kullanılan Dikiş Materyallerinin Çekme Direncinin Değerlendirilmesi-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Diş Hekimliğinde Kullanılan Dikiş Materyallerinin Çekme Direncinin Değerlendirilmesi

Published:2023-05-10 Issue:2 Volume:13 Page:189-193
ISSN:2792-0542
Container-title:Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

ERCAL Pinar¹^ORCID,ERTEN TAYŞİ Ayşegül²^ORCID,TAYŞİ Nuri Mert³^ORCID,ŞİŞMANOĞLU Soner⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Queen Mary University of London

2. ALTINBAS UNIVERSITY

3. ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY-CERRAHPASA, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY

4. ALTINBAS UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL SCIENCES (FACULTY OF DENTISTRY), DEPARTMENT OF RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical properties of sutures used in dentistry according to different materials in vitro. Material and Methods: Eight 3-0 different absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials with 3-0 gauge (Polytetraflouroethylene, polypropylene, polyester, polyglactin 910, polyglycolic acid, poliglecaprone 25, polydioxanone, and silk) were compared in terms of mechanical strength. All sutures were tied with a simple suture technique. Each material contained 10 samples per group, with a total sample size of 80 specimens. Failure load was measured in N while elongation was measured in µm using a microtensile testing device. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the difference in failure loads and elongation values. Results: Polydioxanone was significantly more resistant to tensile forces among all tested materials (p

Publisher

Duzce Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu Dergisi

Reference23 articles.

1. Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Influence of suturing on wound healing. Periodontology. 2000 2015; 68(1): 270-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12078.

2. Karaca E, Hockenberger AS, Yildiz H. Investigating changes in mechanical properties and tissue reaction of silk, polyester, polyamide, and polypropylene sutures in vivo. Textile Research Journal. 2005; 75(4): 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517505054734.

3. Kim JC, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures. Journal of Materials Science Materials Medicine. 2007; 18: 2363-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3114-6.

4. Bryne M, Aly A. The surgical suture. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2009; 39(Suppl_2):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz036.

5. Arce J, Palacios A, Alvitez-Temoche D, Mendoza-Azpur G, Romero-Tapia P, Mayta-Tovalino F. Tensile strength of novel nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus other suture materials: an in vitro study. International Journal of Dentistry. 2019; ID7419709. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7419708.