Affiliation:
1. Gomel State Medical University; Gomel Regional Clinical Cardiological Center
2. Gomel Regional Clinical Cardiological Center
3. Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital
Abstract
Objective. To perform a comparative analysis of three methods for assessing blood loss (gravimetric, hemoglobin dilution, hemoglobin balance) in patients with heart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CB).Materials and methods. The study involved 35 patients over the age of 18 who underwent heart surgery under CB. The volume of blood loss was assessed by the gravimetric method and compared with the blood loss volume calculated by hemoglobin dilution and hemoglobin balance methods.Results. After the patient was admitted from the operating room to the intensive care unit, the blood loss calculated by the hemoglobin dilution method did not differ from the blood loss measured by the gravimetric method. After 12-18 hrs after surgery, the blood loss calculated by hemoglobin dilution and hemoglobin balance methods did not differ from the blood loss measured gravimetrically. After 36-42 hrs after surgery, blood loss calculated by hemoglobin dilution and hemoglobin balance formulas was statistically significantly different from that measured by gravimetric method.Conclusion. The blood loss calculated by the hemoglobin dilution method corresponds to the blood loss measured by gravimetric method at the stages “admission from the operating room” and “12-18 hours after surgery”. The volume of blood calculated by the method of hemoglobin balance at the stage “12-18 hours after surgery” corresponds to the volume of blood measured by gravimetric method. All of the above calculation methods at the stage of the study “36-42 hours after surgery” cannot be recommended for calculating the volume of blood loss after heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Publisher
Gomel State Medical University
Reference11 articles.
1. Hensley FA, Martin DE, Gravely GP. Practical cardioanesthesiology: translated from English. 3rd ed. Moscow, RF: Med inform agency; 2008. 1104 p. (In Russ.).
2. Tran A, Heuser J, Ramsay T, McIsaac DI, Martel G. Techniques for blood loss estimation in major non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 2021 Feb 1;68(2):245-255.
3. Gerdessen L, Meybohm P, Choorapoikayil S, Herrmann E, Taeuber I, Neef V, et al. Comparison of common perioperative blood loss estimation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Apr;35(2):245-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00579-8
4. Jaramillo S, Montane-Muntane M, Capitan D, Aguilar F, Vilaseca A, Blasi A, et al. Agreement of surgical blood loss estimation methods. Transfusion. 2019 Feb;59(2):508-515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15052
5. Zenkov AA, Ostrovsky UP, Vykhristenko KS, Loiko NG. Comparative analysis of the results of minimally invasive myocardial revascularization, coronary bypass grafting on a beating heart and with cardiopulmonary bypass. Surgery News. 2014;22(1):33-43. (In Russ.).