Healthy, happy, rational: reflections on genetic counselling in the GDR

Author:

Doetz Susanne

Abstract

The development of genetic counselling in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) was closely connected to a well-established system of prenatal care and a process that placed reproductive decisions in the hands of women. It was embedded in the pronatalist reproductive policy of the GDR and a narrative of medical and (socialist) humanistic progress. As in other countries at that time, it promoted the goal of avoiding the birth of children with disabilities and was hence based on ableist premises. In this paper, I focus on communicative aspects of genetic counselling, as it was established in the 1970s and 1980s in university and district clinics. Thus, on the one hand I explore the communication of genetic counselling to the public; and on the other, I study the communication processes in genetic counselling centres themselves. In contrast to the USA, where the ‘genetic counsellor’ became established as a professional identity in the 1970s, there was no distinct profession of ‘genetic counsellor’ in the GDR. Instead, counselling was practised by physicians or biologists with a special interest in human genetics. This resulted in a strong emphasis in these clinical encounters on diagnosis and technical solutions, as well as an educational impetus. I propose that an important goal of genetic counselling in the GDR was to generate a sense of ‘rationality’ in prospective parents. To achieve this, those advocating and giving counselling explicitly sought to distance this practice from the eugenic ideas of the past, and to dispel superstitious ideas of heredity and religious ideas of fate. In addition, they attempted to alleviate emotions such as fear and guilt. It was in that context that counselling physicians and biologists provided interpretations of genetic findings, risk figures and disease values. I show how different interests and experiences shaped these and how risk evaluations structured counsellor-counsellee communication.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Philosophy,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference109 articles.

1. The Global State of the Genetic Counseling Profession

2. Achtelik K . 2015. Selbstbestimmte Norm: Feminismus, Pränataldiagnostik, Abtreibung. Berlin: Verbrecher Verlag.

3. Bach H . 1974. “Mögliche Humangenetische Maßnahmen und ihre Problematik.” In III. Kühlungsborner Kolloquium im Oktober 1972: Philosophische und ethische Probleme der Molekularbiologie, edited by Geissler Erhard , 167–79. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

4. Bach H . 1975. “Grundsätzliche Probleme Der Humangenetischen Beratung.” In Humangenetische Beratung Genetisch Belasteter Personen: Bericht Der Internationalen Wissenschaftlichen Tagung Vom 13. Bis 17. Mai 1974 in Mühlhausen/Thüringen, edited by Bach Herbert , 11–21. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität.

5. “Zur Entwicklung und gegenwärtigen Situation des humangenetischen Beratungsdienstes in der DDR.”;Bach;Das Deutsche Gesundheitswesen,1983

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3