Animal research nexus: a new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare

Author:

Davies GailORCID,Gorman RichardORCID,Greenhough BethORCID,Hobson-West PruORCID,Kirk Robert G WORCID,Message ReubenORCID,Myelnikov DmitriyORCID,Palmer AlexandraORCID,Roe EmmaORCID,Ashall VanessaORCID,Crudgington BentleyORCID,McGlacken RenelleORCID,Peres SaraORCID,Skidmore TessORCID

Abstract

Animals used in biological research and testing have become integrated into the trajectories of modern biomedicine, generating increased expectations for and connections between human and animal health. Animal research also remains controversial and its acceptability is contingent on a complex network of relations and assurances across science and society, which are both formally constituted through law and informal or assumed. In this paper, we propose these entanglements can be studied through an approach that understands animal research as a nexus spanning the domains of science, health and animal welfare. We introduce this argument through, first, outlining some key challenges in UK debates around animal research, and second, reviewing the way nexus concepts have been used to connect issues in environmental research. Third, we explore how existing social sciences and humanities scholarship on animal research tends to focus on different aspects of the connections between scientific research, human health and animal welfare, which we suggest can be combined in a nexus approach. In the fourth section, we introduce our collaborative research on the animal research nexus, indicating how this approach can be used to study the history, governance and changing sensibilities around UK laboratory animal research. We suggest the attention to complex connections in nexus approaches can be enriched through conversations with the social sciences and medical humanities in ways that deepen appreciation of the importance of path-dependency and contingency, inclusion and exclusion in governance and the affective dimension to research. In conclusion, we reflect on the value of nexus thinking for developing research that is interdisciplinary, interactive and reflexive in understanding how accounts of the histories and current relations of animal research have significant implications for how scientific practices, policy debates and broad social contracts around animal research are being remade today.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Philosophy,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference105 articles.

1. Affective atmospheres

2. Animal Research Annex . “Mouse Exchange @ Southampton Science and Engineering Festival.”, 2019. https://animalresearchnexus.org/events/mouse-exchange-southampton-science-and-engineering-festival. Accessed 28 Aug 2019.

3. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act , 1986. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/14/contents.

4. Historiographic reflections on model organisms: or how the mureaucracy may be limiting our understanding of contemporary genetics and genomics;Ankeny;History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences,2010

5. Making Organisms Model Human Behavior: Situated Models in North-American Alcohol Research, since 1950

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3