Abstract
Medical humanities has tended first and foremost to be associated with the ways in which the arts and humanities help us to understand health. However, this is not the only or necessarily the primary aim of our field. What the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed above all is what the field ofcriticalmedical humanities has insisted on: the deep entanglement of social, cultural, historical life with the biomedical. The pandemic has been a time for reinstating the power of expertise of a particular kind, focusing on epidemiology, scientific modelling of potential outcomes and vaccine development. All of this delivered by science at speed.It has been challenging for medical humanities researchers to find purchase in these debates with insights from our more contemplative, ‘slow research’ approaches. However, as the height of the crisis passes, our field might now be coming into its own. The pandemic, as well as being productive of scientific expertise, also demonstrated clearly the meaning of culture: that it is not a static entity, but is produced and evolves through interaction and relationship. Taking a longer view, we can see the emergence of a certain ‘COVID-19 culture’ characterised by entanglements between expert knowledge, social media, the economy, educational progress, risk to health services and people in their socio-economic, political ethnic and religious/spiritual contexts. It is the role of medical humanities to pay attention to those interactions and to examine how they play out in the human experience and potential impact of the pandemic. However, to survive and grow in significance within the field of healthcare research, we need to engage not just to comment. There is a need for medical humanities scholars to assert our expertise in interdisciplinary research, fully engaged with experts by experience, and to work proactively with funders to demonstrate our value.
Subject
Philosophy,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference48 articles.
1. Academy of Medical Sciences . 2016. “Improving the Health of the Public by 2040.” Available from: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/snip/uploads/5807581429f81.pdf. Accessed 26 Aug 2022.
2. Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality
3. “Sentiments and Emotions Evoked by News Headlines of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak.”;Aslam;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,2020
4. ‘The Medical’ and ‘Health’ in a Critical Medical Humanities
5. Barlow M. D . 2021. “Christian Nationalism is a Barrier to Mass Vaccination Against COVID-19.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/christian-nationalism-is-a-barrier-to-mass-vaccination-against-covid-19-158023.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献