(Post)confessional mode and psychological surveillance inThe CrownandFleabag

Author:

Hagaman SarahORCID

Abstract

Contemporary television’s portrayals of psychotherapy reveal anxieties surrounding surveillance and intimate self-disclosure in clinical and therapeutic settings. This paper analyses two twenty-first century television series featuring therapy sessions that observe and monitor mental states for prognostic purposes, engaging in what Alan Westin terms psychological surveillance: Peter Morgan’sThe Crown(2016–2023) and Phoebe Waller-Bridge’sFleabag(2016–2019). These shows feature contrasting modes of intimate self-disclosure—confessions and postconfessions—that emerge in psychotherapy. The confessional mode emphasises authenticity and a desire for healing. Postconfessions, on the other hand, are a parodical mode of revelation that refuse the authenticity and intimacy elicited by therapy and traditional confessional modes. Confessional discourses inThe Crownreveal that state power, reinforced by genetic authentication, can benefit from psychological surveillance. In contrast,Fleabaguses postconfessional discourse to implicate the audience in the therapeutic encounter, capitalising on the increasingly decentralised self-care modalities sustained through social media, television and other audience-driven mediums.

Funder

Vanderbilt’s Center for Genetic Privacy and Identity

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Philosophy,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. “Proposing a Post-Heritage Critical Framework: The Crown, Ambiguity, and Media Self-Consciousness.”;Abbiss;Television & New Media,2020

2. Abbiss W. S . 2020b. “The Crown, ‘The Hereditary Principle’: The Questions That Remain,” Reading the Visual Blog.” Available from: https://readingvisual.wordpress.com/2020/12/28/the-crown-the-hereditary-principle-the-questions-that-remain

3. “Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s Fleabag: Direct Address and Narrative Control from Stage to Small Screen.”;Beaumont;Journal of International Women’s Studies,2021

4. Extraordinary minds, impossible choices: mental health, special skills and television

5. “It’s Good to Talk? Talking Cure and the Ethics of on-Screen Psychotherapy.”;Blaker;Journal of Media Practice,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3