Opacity, difference and not knowing: what can psychiatry learn from the work of Édouard Glissant?

Author:

Strand MattiasORCID

Abstract

Martinican poet, novelist and cultural theorist Édouard Glissant (1928–2011) rejected contemporary simplistic notions of creole hybridity popularised in the 1980s and 1990s in favour of a unique and explicitly antiessentialist construct of Caribbeanness—a form of being that embraces place while shunning any associated ideas of rootednesss. Throughout his work, there is a constant tension between the local and the global, the particular and the universal, the essentialist and the homogenising, a tension that is never resolved but used creatively to stake out an emergent third position against a backdrop of a metaphorical Caribbean seascape. The purpose of this article is to shed light on a central idea developed by Glissant: the importance of acknowledging opacity in the encounter with the Other, in contrast to idealised notions of transparency as inherently desirable. This ‘right to opacity’ has been embraced in poststructural theory, postcolonial activism and contemporary art. However, I argue that opacity is also a highly relevant notion in clinical contexts, as an essential resource for understanding concepts such as first-person, second-person and third-person perspectives in the phenomenology of mental health and illness. For illustration, I point to a number of clinical tools and approaches—such as the Cultural Formulation Interview, Therapeutic Assessment and the employment of a not-knowing stance in mentalisation-based treatment—that successfully incorporate a respect for opacity as a core value in the clinician-patient encounter. This article is not an attempt to offer a definitive how-to guide on how to make use of the ideas of Édouard Glissant in the clinic; instead, I hope to inspire further discussion about how various notions of opacity and transparency come into play for mental health practitioners and how acknowledging alterity and difference may contribute to more fruitful and respectful ways of engaging with the patient-as-Other.

Publisher

BMJ

Reference79 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association . 2013. “Cultural Formulation.” In Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.

2. Bateman A. , and Fonagy P. . 2012. “Individual Techniques of the Basic Model.” In Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice, edited by Bateman Anthony and Fonagy Peter , 67–80. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

3. Bateman A. , and Fonagy P. . “Glossary.” In Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice, edited by Bateman Anthony , and Fonagy Peter , 511–7. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2012a.

4. Bateman A. , and Fonagy P. . 2016. “Mentalization-Based Treatment for Personality Disorders.” In Mentalization-Based Treatment for Personality Disorders: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Incorporated. doi:10.1093/med:psych/9780199680375.001.0001

5. Benítez-Rojo A . 1997. The Repeating Island: The Caribbean and the Postmodern Perspective. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv11319qv

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3