Abstract
Enactivism is an emerging theory for sense-making (cognition) with increasing applications to research and medicine. Enactivists reject the idea that sense-making is simply in the head or can be reduced to neural processes. Instead, enactivists argue that cognisers (people) are embodied and action-oriented, and that sense-making emerges from relational processes distributed across the brain-body-environment. We start this paper with an overview of a recently proposed enactive approach to pain. With rich theoretical and empirical roots in phenomenology and cognitive science, conceptualising pain as an enactive process is appealing as it overcomes the problematic dualist and reductionist nature of current pain theories and healthcare practices. Second, we discuss metaphor in the context of pain and enactivism, including a pain-related metaphor classification system. Third, we present and discuss five paintings created alongside an enactive study of clinical communication and the co-construction of pain-related meanings. Each painting represents pain-related metaphors delivered by clinicians during audio-recorded clinical appointments or discussed by clinicians and patients during interviews. We classify these metaphors, connecting them to enactive theory and relevant literature. The art, metaphors and associated narratives draw attention to the intertwined nature of language, meaning and pain. Of clinical relevance to primary and allied healthcare, we explore how clinicians’ taken-for-granted pain-related metaphors can act as scaffolding for patients’ pain and agency, for better or worse. We visually depict and give examples of clinical situations where metaphors became enactive, in that they were clinically reinforced and embodied through assessment and treatment. We conclude with research and clinical considerations, suggesting that enactive metaphor is a widely overlooked learning mechanism that clinicians could consider employing and intentionally shape.
Subject
Philosophy,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference75 articles.
1. Baggs Edward , and Chemero Anthony . “Radical embodiment in two directions.” Synthese 13, no. 3 (2018).doi:10.1007/s11229-018-02020-9
2. Divided by a lack of common language? - a qualitative study exploring the use of language by health professionals treating back pain;Barker;BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,2009
3. Neuropathic pain: diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment;Baron;The Lancet Neurology,2010
4. Benner Patricia E . Interpretive Phenomenology: Embodiment, Caring, and Ethics in Health and Illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.
5. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A comprehensive model
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献