Estimating the attributable fraction of mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome to inform enrichment in future randomised clinical trials

Author:

Saha RohitORCID,Pham Tài,Sinha Pratik,Maddali Manoj V,Bellani Giacomo,Fan Eddy,Summers CharlotteORCID,Douiri AbdelORCID,Rubenfeld Gordon D,Calfee Carolyn S,Laffey John GerardORCID,McAuley Daniel Francis,Shankar-Hari ManuORCID

Abstract

BackgroundEfficiency of randomised clinical trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) depends on the fraction of deaths attributable to ARDS (AFARDS) to which interventions are targeted. Estimates of AFARDSin subpopulations of ARDS could improve design of ARDS trials.MethodsWe performed a matched case-control study using the Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE cohort. Primary outcome was intensive care unit mortality. We used nearest neighbour propensity score matching without replacement to match ARDS to non-ARDS populations. We derived two separate AFARDSestimates by matching patients with ARDS to patients with non-acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (non-AHRF) and to patients with AHRF with unilateral infiltrates only (AHRF-UL). We also estimated AFARDSin subgroups based on severity of hypoxaemia, number of lung quadrants involved and hyperinflammatory versus hypoinflammatory phenotypes. Additionally, we derived AFAHRFestimates by matching patients with AHRF to non-AHRF controls, and AFAHRF-ULestimates by matching patients with AHRF-UL to non-AHRF controls.ResultsEstimated AFARDSwas 20.9% (95% CI 10.5% to 31.4%) when compared with AHRF-UL controls and 38.0% (95% CI 34.4% to 41.6%) compared with non-AHRF controls. Within subgroups, estimates for AFARDScompared with AHRF-UL controls were highest in patients with severe hypoxaemia (41.1% (95% CI 25.2% to 57.1%)), in those with four quadrant involvement on chest radiography (28.9% (95% CI 13.4% to 44.3%)) and in the hyperinflammatory subphenotype (26.8% (95% CI 6.9% to 46.7%)). Estimated AFAHRFwas 33.8% (95% CI 30.5% to 37.1%) compared with non-AHRF controls. Estimated AFAHRF-ULwas 21.3% (95% CI 312.8% to 29.7%) compared with non-AHRF controls.ConclusionsOverall AFARDSmean values were between 20.9% and 38.0%, with higher AFARDSseen with severe hypoxaemia, four quadrant involvement on chest radiography and hyperinflammatory ARDS.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca

St. Michael's Hospital Foundation

European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3