Comparative effectiveness of combined antiplatelet treatments in acute minor ischaemic stroke

Author:

Kim Shina,Kim Joon-TaeORCID,Lee Ji Sung,Kim Beom JoonORCID,Park Jong-Moo,Kang Kyusik,Lee Soo Joo,Kim Jae Guk,Cha Jae-Kwan,Kim Dae-Hyun,Park Tai Hwan,Park Sang-Soon,Lee Kyung Bok,Lee Jun,Hong Keun-Sik,Cho Yong-Jin,Park Hong-Kyun,Lee Byung-Chul,Yu Kyung-Ho,Oh Mi Sun,Kim Dong-Eog,Ryu Wi-Sun,Choi Jay Chol,Kwon Jee-Hyun,Kim Wook-Joo,Shin Dong-Ick,Sohn Sung-Il,Hong Jeong-HoORCID,Park Man-Seok,Choi Kang-Ho,Cho Ki-Hyun,Lee Juneyoung,Bae Hee-Joon

Abstract

BackgroundNo study has thoroughly compared the effectiveness of combined antiplatelet treatments (other than clopidogrel–aspirin) versus clopidogrel–aspirin or aspirin alone for early secondary prevention in acute ischaemic stroke.MethodsWe identified patients with acute, minor, non-cardiogenic ischaemic stroke treated with aspirin alone, clopidogrel–aspirin or other combination treatment. Propensity scores considering the inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to adjust for baseline imbalances. The primary outcome was the composite of all strokes (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality at 3 months.ResultsAmong 12 234 patients (male: 61.9%; age: 65.5±13 years) who met the eligibility criteria, aspirin, clopidogrel–aspirin and other combination treatments were administered in 52.2%, 42.9% and 4.9% of patients, respectively. In the crude analysis, the primary outcome event at 3 months occurred in 14.5% of the other combination group, 14.4% of the aspirin group and 13.0% of the clopidogrel–aspirin group. In the weighted Cox proportional hazards analysis, the 3-month primary outcome event occurred less frequently in the clopidogrel–aspirin group than in the other combination group (weighted HR: 0.82 (0.59–1.13)), while no association was found between the aspirin group (weighted HR: 1.04 (0.76–1.44)) or other combination group and the 3-month primary outcome.ConclusionOther combined antiplatelet treatment, compared with aspirin alone or clopidogrel–aspirin, was not associated with reduced risks of primary composite vascular events or recurrent stroke during the first 3 months after stroke. Therefore, the results suggest that other combination treatments, particularly the cilostazol-based combination, may not be effective alternatives for clopidogrel–aspirin to prevent early vascular events in patients with acute minor stroke. Further exploration in clinical trials will be needed.

Funder

Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3