Abstract
ObjectivesUptake of cervical screening among women aged 50–64 years is declining. Not feeling at risk because of current sexual behaviour is a reason some older women give for not being screened. We hypothesised that explaining the long interval between acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV) and developing cervical cancer would increase the relevance of screening in older women.MethodsWomen aged 50–64 years (n=597) who did not intend to go for screening were recruited through an online panel and randomised to one of three information conditions: cause only (basic information about HPV and cervical cancer), cause with basic timeline (also read a sentence describing the long interval between acquiring HPV and developing cervical cancer) and cause with explicit timeline (read the same as the timeline group alongside an explanation of what this means for older women). Perceived risk of cervical cancer, screening intention strength and understanding of HPV were assessed preinformation and postinformation exposure.ResultsInformation condition was significantly associated with risk perceptions and intention strength postintervention (F(2,593)=6.26, p=0.002 and F(2,593)=4.98, p=0.007 respectively). Women in the cause with explicit timeline condition were more likely to increase their risk perceptions and intention strength compared with cause only (24% vs 9% and 25% vs 13% for risk perceptions and intention, respectively). In the cause with explicit timeline group, women with 4–10 lifetime partners had higher odds of increasing their perceived risk and intention strength postintervention compared with those with 0–1 partners (OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.12 and OR=3.20, 95% CI 1.34 to 7.67, respectively).ConclusionsProviding a clear explanation that decouples women’s perceived cervical cancer risk from their current sexual behaviour has the potential to increase perceived risk of cervical cancer and intentions to be screened among older women. Providing women with a clear cognitive representation of the aetiology of cervical cancer may be one approach to increasing screening uptake.
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Dermatology
Reference24 articles.
1. Castañón A , Landy R , Cuzick J , et al . Cervical screening at age 50–64 years and the risk of cervical cancer at age 65 years and older: population-based case control study. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001585.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001585
2. Screening & Immunisations team ND . Cervical Screening Programme: England, 2017-18, 2018
3. Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: data from a national sample of British women;Marlow;Eur J Cancer,2017
4. Bennett KF , Waller J , Chorley AJ , et al . Barriers to cervical screening and interest in self-sampling among women who actively decline screening. J Med Screen 2018:969141318767471 (published Online First: 2018/04/14).
5. Variation in health beliefs across different types of cervical screening non-participants;Marlow;Prev Med,2018
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献