Detection of arrhythmia: limited usefulness of patient activated recording devices.-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Detection of arrhythmia: limited usefulness of patient activated recording devices.

Published:1984-10-27 Issue:6452 Volume:289 Page:1106-1107
ISSN:0959-8138
Container-title:BMJ
language:en
Short-container-title:BMJ

Author:

Thomas L E,Shapiro L M,Perrins E J,Fox K M

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,General Engineering

Reference6 articles.

1. Current status of ambulatory electrocardiography;Winkle, R.;Am Heart J,1981

2. Evaluation of outpatient arrhythmia utilizing transtelephonic monitoring;Judson, P.; Holmes, D.R.; Baker, W.P.;Am Heart_J,1979

3. Arrhythmia surveillance by transtelephonic monitoring: comparison with Holter monitoring in symptomatic ambulatory patients;Grodman, R.; Capone, R.Y.; Most, A.S.;Am Heartj7

4. Transtelephonic arrhythmia diagnosis: an advance?;Bucknall, C.A.; Broomen, I.; Dunkley, G.; Curry, P.V.L.;[Abstract.] Br Heart J,1983

5. Accepted,1984

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Centenary of tele-electrocardiography and telephonocardiography – where are we today?;Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare;2005-10-01

2. Cardiac event recording yields more diagnoses than 24–hour Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations;Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare;2005-07

3. Costs and utility of tests in the evaluation of the pediatric patients with syncope;Progress in Pediatric Cardiology;2001-08

4. Evaluation of Patients with Palpitations: Cardiac Event Recorder Versus 48-hour Holter Monitoring;Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology;2000-10

5. Evaluation and outcomes of patients with palpitations;The American Journal of Medicine;1996-02